Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:50:37 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: different c++ names mangling...
Message-ID:	<20030417165037.GA12623@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3E9E717D DOT 3070001 AT noos DOT fr>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3E9E717D.3070001@noos.fr>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:18:53AM +0200, Vaillant Etienne wrote:
>There are few days, I have a discution on Mico-devel mailing
>list(mico-devel AT mico DOT org) about the MICO's port on Cygwin.  So, they
>explain me that : dll from MS VC7 and gcc 3.2 under cygwin have a
>different c++ names mangling.
>
>Have you any information ?

None beyond what you already know.  This situation isn't going to change,
unfortunately.

MSVC and gcc will probably always use different name mangling techniques.

cgf
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -