Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E9B8668.8060307@itee.uq.edu.au>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:11:20 +1000
From:	John Williams <jwilliams AT itee DOT uq DOT edu DOT au>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	gmane.os.cygwin
To:	lhall AT rfk DOT com
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: chmod again
References:	<b7fpp1$o56$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <20030415023356 DOT GA48685509 AT hpn5170x> <b7fs6q$vfr$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3E9B752B DOT 6080502 AT rfk DOT com> <b7fsuk$1eg$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <20030415031435 DOT GC8800 AT redhat DOT com> <b7ftmh$33t$2 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3E9B7BCD DOT 6030204 AT rfk DOT com> <b7fuan$33t$4 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3E9B80DB DOT 5000802 AT rfk DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<3E9B80DB.5000802@rfk.com>
X-Spam-Checked:	This message probably not SPAM
X-Spam-Score:	-1.8
X-Spam-Tests:	IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_05_08,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
X-Spam-Report:	SPAM: -1.80 hits, 8 required;
	SPAM: * -0.8 -- Found a In-Reply-To header
	SPAM: * -0.6 -- User-Agent header indicates a non-spam MUA (Mozilla)
	SPAM: * -0.5 -- Has a valid-looking References header
	SPAM: * -0.5 -- Found a User-Agent header
	SPAM: * -0.2 -- Found a X-Accept-Language header
	SPAM: * 1.6 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 05 to 08 (medium)
	SPAM: * -0.8 -- BODY: Contains what looks like a quoted email text
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)

Hi Larry,

Thanks for your patience with this.

> Well, a few but I can't guarantee anything.  Type in the following and
> send the output here:
> 
> which chmod

/usr/bin/chmod

> cygcheck chmod

nothing unexpected in there (pointing to appropriate cygwin and windows 
dlls)

> 
> I tried 'ntea' here on 1.3.22 and it works fine for me on FAT (see below).
> You can try replicating this yourself and see if it provides any insight
> as to what's different there (beyond XP vs W2K - which is what I'm
> running here).  /Floppy is just a mount point to a:.  That's the only
> FAT partition I have that I was willing to sacrifice for this test. ;-)

[snip]

Tried it, no luck :(

> If this doesn't help, you're quickest solution may be converting your
> partition to NTFS and using ntsec.

Yeah except if I go ntfs then it cannot be a writeable linux dual-boot 
partition.

bleugh....

Someone on the uclinux/microblaze mailing list has managed to get 
microblaze-gcc up and running on linux.  I think when I return from 
holidays I'll do a linux install and start again there.

Thanks for trying, I really do appreciate it, but it seems like the 
original stunned surprise from folks when I said I was doing linux 
kernel builds under cygwin had some basis in reality...

Cheers,

John


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -