Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2003 15:56:41 +0100 (WEST)
From:	Andrey Romanenko <andrew AT eq DOT uc DOT pt>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: g77 + gcc + flex + bison woes
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0304141043340.26381-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0304141554100.18871-100000@nectar.eq.uc.pt>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Igor,

> Did you try putting the library after your main module, like this:
>
>    gcc yourmain.o -fl -o myprog
>
> ?  This way, the main() from your code should have been pulled in first.
> The order of gcc arguments does matter, and there is usually no need to
> pull a module from the library...

Yes, I have -lfl at the very end of the lile. I am aware of the issue.
In that case this looks like a bug. Or, a feature of the rather
complicated salad that I have (g77+gcc+bison+flex).

Andrey



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -