Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<00b601c3028d$65a9d8a0$3f33fea9@HAPPYCOMPUTER>
From:	"Gareth Pearce" <gpea0679 AT mail DOT usyd DOT edu DOT au>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	crypt...
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:38:39 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

I was wondering if (other than for someone to actually do it) there was some
explicit reason for crypt to be seperate to cygwin?  Sort of makes
satisfying SUSv2 unistd.h impossible...  I see its optional in SUSv3 ...
Sure its simple to work arround, but it would be nice if it 'just worked'.

Regards,
Gareth



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -