Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/04/10/20:04:44
Max,
At 16:26 2003-04-10, you wrote:
>Randall R Schulz wrote:
> > To Whom It May Concern,
> >
> > The IETF publishes this standard for electronic mail on the Internet
> > using HTML and even supports resource references in the HTML whose
> > targets (images, sounds, etc.) can be incorporated into the same MIME
> > message as the HTML body.
> >
> > In my opinion, it's simply foolish to anchor electronic mail in the
> > pre-markup, pre-media days of text-only electronic communication.
>
>There's nothing wrong with HTML mail when used tastefully and in a way which
>enhances communication.
>
>Unfortunately, a lot (most?) of the time, HTML mail is used in such a way
>that it detracts from the content of the message and is simply a needless
>bandwidth sucker.
As to taste, the pattern that typically presents itself is that when a
new, richer mode of expression becomes widely available is that they
get a little crazy at first. Soon enough, however, they settle down to
reasonably moderate usage. Desktop publishing showed this phenomenon
with excessive use of multiple fonts, font variation and other
goo-gaws. You don't see much of that any more.
I'm unsympathetic to the bandwidth waste argument. There's abundant
bandwidth on the Internet (in fact, there's a lot of dark fiber out
there just waiting to be used). I have only a dial-up modem and I have
no trouble doing the usual Internet browsing (in fact, probably more
than usual, and I'm a bit of troller, actually--as in trolling for
resources as a fisherman trolls for fish, that is). On top of my Web
use, I get upward of 500 email messages each day including the
distributions of 25 mailing lists. Except for the 100 or so that are
spam (I kid you not), I save them all.
By far most of the HTML mail is UCE. Some of that is grotesque (not for
its message content, but for its presentation) but even the spam is
mostly decent HTML. For the few pieces of mail that I actually solicit
in HTML mode (newsletters such as those published by the Java Developer
Connection or WinXPnews or the New Scientist newsletter) I enable the
Microsoft viewer in Eudora. Otherwise for simple font variations,
bullets and indents, Eudora's built-in rendering is fine (though not
without its glitches).
A decent dial-up modem (by which I mean a well-designed v.92 modem)
will compress HTML to the point where 10 to 11 kilobytes per second
throughput is readily achieved. This is almost twice the speed that
most of the links in the original ARPAnet used (not that it's very
significant--I just think it's interesting).
>Max.
Randall Schulz
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -