Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:26:47 +0100
Message-ID:	<821-Thu10Apr2003212647+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	FAQ help needed (Was: Bug? Mixed CR/LF and LF line endings from different programs)
In-Reply-To:	<20020830004815.GA25716@redhat.com>
References:	<20020829203820 DOT GB23580 AT redhat DOT com>
	<20020830001556 DOT 9D66C8B1F AT bellmann DOT research DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
	<20020830004815 DOT GA25716 AT redhat DOT com>
From:	David Starks-Browning <david AT starks-browning DOT com>

Here's a blast from the past.  OK, so now everyone knows that I'm 7
months behind in the cygwin mailing list.

On Thursday 29 Aug 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
> >which seems to contradict the Cygwin FAQ:
> >
> >    It is rather easy for the porter to fix the source code by supplying
> >    the appropriate file processing mode switches to the open/fopen
> >    functions. Treat all text files as text and treat all binary files
> >    as binary. 
> 
> That section of the FAQ is out-of-date.

Indeed, it is.  (We're talking about the section "How is the DOS/Unix
CR/LF thing handled?" in the API chapter of the FAQ.)

Can anyone contribute a re-write of this section?

The message I'm citing is at
<http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-08/msg01597.html>, in case you want
to study the thread.

Thanks,
David
(Cygwin FAQ maintainer)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -