Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	rainer DOT typke AT cs DOT uu DOT nl, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select
	prev
Organization:	Jan at Appel
From:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	Tue, 08 Apr 2003 23:00:37 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<1049834756.893.89.camel@localhost> (Robert Collins's message
	of "09 Apr 2003 06:45:56 +1000")
Message-ID:	<871y0caemi.fsf@peder.flower>
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0304031227120 DOT 21921-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
	<87n0j050ts DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower> <1049834756 DOT 893 DOT 89 DOT camel AT localhost>
MIME-Version:	1.0

Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com> writes:

> Anyway, I still don't see what went wrong - the user selected tetex, and
> got tetex. tetex-beta wasn't installed, and shouldn't have been.

As I understand it, Rainer selected tetex-beta (because thought that
must be newer), changed his mind, selected tetex instead.  Then,
tetex didn't work because neither of tetex-tiny/tetex-base got
installed.

Rainer, is that correct?

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -