Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not
	select prev
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<87n0j050ts.fsf@peder.flower>
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0304031227120 DOT 21921-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
	<87n0j050ts DOT fsf AT peder DOT flower>
Organization:
Message-Id:	<1049834756.893.89.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Date:	09 Apr 2003 06:45:56 +1000

--=-6BfGY+H+FTCaDRjm5mfW
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 03:57, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:


> Setup does not have a `conflicts:' afaik, but I don't see how that
> should help?  The new packages should get installed automagically
> through the new `requires:' fields for the old packages.

We have conflicts and replaces in setup.ini *now*, but we don't do
anything with them.

Patches gratefully....=20

Anyway, I still don't see what went wrong - the user selected tetex, and
got tetex. tetex-beta wasn't installed, and shouldn't have been.

Rob
--=20
GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.

--=-6BfGY+H+FTCaDRjm5mfW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+kzUEI5+kQ8LJcoIRApelAJ41O4Ir4V+u7LbIv1x+qsotkVmc5gCgn00h
OdtkxEHvsjqw9au6rlt7YBs=
=zbM0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-6BfGY+H+FTCaDRjm5mfW--

- Raw text -