Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Nicholas Wourms <nwourms AT netscape DOT net>
Subject:	Re: perl 5.8.0-2 and WaitForMultipleObjects under win98
Date:	Tue, 08 Apr 2003 11:56:59 -0400
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<3E92F14B.7020801@netscape.net>
References:	<3E8D9891 DOT 1020504 AT email DOT byu DOT edu> <3E8DEA6A DOT 6030605 AT netscape DOT net> <31849447971 DOT 20030405105207 AT familiehaase DOT de> <3E8EDC25 DOT 5000505 AT netscape DOT net> <20030407122702 DOT GE2536 AT tishler DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en

Jason Tishler wrote:
> Nicholas,
> 
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:37:41AM -0500, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> 
>>Hopefully it won't require rebase to run the tests...
> 
> 
> Why?  Ralf and I wrote rebase just for *you*! :,)
> 
> Jason
> 

No, my point wasn't to insult rebase, rather that the 
testing phase of perl is automated and combined with the 
building phase.  In the current scheme, conflicting dlls 
would cause the errors and so on and so forth...  So in this 
case I suppose I could edit the perl build system to run 
rebase...

Cheers,
Nicholas



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -