Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:28:43 -0400
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: spell and nano (was reply to cgf about gpl violation)
Message-ID:	<20030407042843.GB21761@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<BAY2-F1896Z3LstPGtP0002025e AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<BAY2-F1896Z3LstPGtP0002025e@hotmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 11:38:44PM +0000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>
>>>Regards,
>>>Gareth - cygwin nano packager.
>>>(PS: Waiting for cgf's supprised look - since nano-devel's Chris complied
>>>immediately - or at least is trying too...)
>>
>>I'm very gratified at the response and indicated as much in my response
>>to nano-devel.
>>
>>cgf
>
>Just wanted to clarify that I didn't mean any criticism here.  It was 
>supposed to be a dodgy attempt at humour - I think I failed there.
>
>Back on topic - anyone experienced and interested in maintaining aspell?
>If not I think i'll have a look into it... (noting that I am very very much 
>not experienced with aspell)

I've asked for volunteers for aspell before with the typical resounding
silence as a result.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -