Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[150.101.193.247]
X-Originating-Email:	[tilps AT hotmail DOT com]
From:	"Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	"Nano-devel list" <nano-devel AT gnu DOT org>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20030405183018 DOT GA27247 AT redhat DOT com> <20030406045233 DOT B51013 AT samwise DOT astyanax DOT org>
Subject:	spell and nano (was reply to cgf about gpl violation)
Date:	Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:46:34 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID:	<BAY2-DAV62pEPkSIkMB00065b5f@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	06 Apr 2003 13:46:49.0273 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8D7D290:01C2FC42]

(crossing to cygwin incase it might inspire someone)
> use nano; for the same reason the (webpage) nano binary uses PDcurses
rather than
> ncurses so no termcap files are needed.  I think the cygwin provided
> version of nano is far superior as things like spell check would
> actually work,
This would be a theory - however since no one has ported and packaged spell
to cygwin - it is not yet the (general) case.

Regards,
Gareth - cygwin nano packager.
(PS: Waiting for cgf's supprised look - since nano-devel's Chris complied
immediately - or at least is trying too...)

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -