Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<001101c2fb4a$2a6e0440$c99ac250@leper>
Reply-To:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
From:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
Subject:	nano and TERM
Date:	Sat, 5 Apr 2003 09:05:47 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Possibly this is a slight simplification, but broadly speaking is the
following an accurate description of things?

Assuming all necessary paths exist, Windows executables (fc, for instance;
can't find much else that's any use) can be called from within Cygwin; and
vice-versa (ls, md5sum, diff; any number of useful others). That's why find,
sort, etc can be problematic, if a user ends up calling the alternative
version to that required.

Lately (can't remember when it started) I've been unable to use nano from
outside Cygwin: I get a "Error opening terminal: cygwin" message. (On the
other hand, pico works fine.) Please can you tell me whether this is a minor
correct-able glitch in nano or whether there's a deeper problem (like, I've
misunderstood the dual-use principle described above).

Thank you.

Fergus


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -