Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[12.254.208.112]
X-Originating-Email:	[mgainty AT hotmail DOT com]
From:	"Martin" <mgainty AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<BF653A78FF4ED0468924C8721AC5EAE7026D2C93 AT df-muttley DOT dogfood> <20030404001614 DOT GA21725 AT redhat DOT com> <20030404002003 DOT GB21725 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: RE: Big Brother is Real
Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:03:04 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MIMEOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID:	<OE52stDz6IuR4J2aN4q00013d06@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	04 Apr 2003 01:03:53.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[0F5D4260:01C2FA46]

To backup Stephans statement it would be in Microsoft's interest to support
32/64 bit Cygwin.
By supporting Cygwin Microsoft would increase and not decrease the installed
base of Windows.
Back to the fray-
Martin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: RE: Big Brother is Real


> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 07:16:14PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:12:24PM -0800, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> >>Speaking only for myself, and not my employer (because I don't know what
> >>he thinks) I can only say that from everyone I've met, and everything I
> >>do know, it appears to me that API changes are always made with
> >>backwards compatibility in mind, and the goal is never to break existing
> >>apps -- indeed, the efforts made to remain compatible with existing apps
> >>are astounding.
> >
> >Given how stupid tricks that were developed on Windows NT3.5 (or
> >earlier) continue to work on Windows 95, Windows 98, W2K, Windows NT4.0,
> >and Windows XP.  I think I can testify to that effort.
>
> ...and by stupid tricks, I mean stupid tricks used in cygwin, of course...
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -