Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/04/03/11:46:50
Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com> writes:
> Thi is by design. We have a single namespace for all packages, even if
> they don't have [curr] elements. In fact prev only elements get
> promoted to curr.
Ah, I didn't know that. That's unfortunate, in this case. The old
tetex-beta and texmf* packages were removed from the archive. Dummy
`upgrade-helper' packages with newer versions were added, that depend
on the new tetex packages.
> You should still have recieved consistent packages, what didn't get
> installed?
Probably the texmf tree. Tetex consists of 7 packages. The fact
obsolete packages (named tetex-beta and texmf*) are also listed, may
add to the confusion; the user probably sees 11 tex-related packages.
From the [curr] release, to get a working tex installation, you need
tetex-bin, and one of tetex-tiny or tetex-base. You can do that by
selecting one of tetex, tetex-tiny, or tetex-base. If you select
tetex-bin, you only get the tex binaries, so that you may combine that
with an already installed texmf tree (read: miktex/texlive).
The upgrade-helpers have been around for over a year. Maybe we should
simply remove them?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -