delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/04/03/11:16:22

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
Subject: Re: Big Brother is Real
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 08:13:27 -0800
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <3E8C5DA7.1000603@Salira.com>
References: <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030401082203 DOT 02e42c30 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030401095832 DOT 028ac2d8 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <3E8C4B24 DOT 9040007 AT jhuapl DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ru, zh

Steve Coleman wrote:

> Randall R Schulz wrote:
>
>> I think we have to work with the legal system, not try to subvert it. 
>> Microsoft has a right to set the licensing terms it wants. We have a 
>> right to tell them to go to hell. Currently however, and as you note, 
>> the power relationship is highly skewed. It ain't easy to "just say 
>> no" to Microsoft.
>
> And in some cases you can't say "no"! 

You can always say no. You may or may not always wish to deal with the 
consequences of saying no. If you don't want to deal with the 
consequences of saying no then you have actively choosen to say yes.

> A long time ago (showing my age here - lol) when I worked for NASA, I 
> first cut my teeth on Cygwin out of desperation to get my job done on 
> a Wintel box. The very fact that it did not possess anything even 
> close to resembling real POSIX was a constant thorn in my side on a 
> daily basis. At the time I was a representative to the X/Open 
> organization and was heavily involved in the system benchmarking and 
> conformance testing to ensure that all equipment supplied on several 
> large contracts adhered to the X/Open standards. That is until the M$ 
> "legal suites" showed up in force and muscled there way in through 
> legal threats. Can you imagine that? NASA, as big of a government 
> organization as it is, being muscled and pushed around by Microsloths 
> lawyers to accept Windows as an X/Open complient operating system? 

No I can't imagine that! Somebody, somewhere decided to say yes instead 
of no. That is not being pushed to say yes.

> Without Cygwin Windoze would never even come close to being X/Open 
> complient, and Cygwin at that point was still in its infant stages of 
> development. The short story is that M$ intimidated NASA into creating 
> a contract just for M$ to sell their stuff even though they were not 
> compliant with any of the benchmark tests or feature lists required in 
> order to compete.  If you can't compete technically (or just need some 
> spare cash on hand), just threaten to sue.
>
> Thank you team Cygwin! ;-)
>
> (These are my own thoughts and opinions and in no way reflect my 
> current or past employers positions in any way)
>
> 8*}




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019