Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[12.254.208.112]
X-Originating-Email:	[mgainty AT hotmail DOT com]
From:	"Martin Gainty" <mgainty AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402183025 DOT 02a99358 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <b6g4tu$e1n$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402183025 DOT 02a99358 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com> <5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030402190652 DOT 0280eea0 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Bug in Cygwin bash?
Date:	Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:23:10 -0700
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID:	<OE28GASvSKQthfZZ2nD00020a7d@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	03 Apr 2003 03:24:00.0348 (UTC) FILETIME=[77FD21C0:01C2F990]

Would someone who has that talent be dealing with short tempered chits?
I dont think so..
-M
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Randall R Schulz" <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in Cygwin bash?


> John,
> 
> Are you a famous composer? If so, are you _the_ famous composer?
> 
> 
> At 18:58 2003-04-02, John Williams wrote:
> >Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >>John,
> >>Yes, there's a limitation on the total volume of argument strings. 
> >>All Unix systems have such a limit and so does Cygwin. The limits 
> >>vary from system to system, though POSIX dictates a minimum value for 
> >>this limit.
> >
> >Anybody know the standard Cygwin limit off the top of their head?  I'm 
> >guessing 32K, given what I saw with mkdep
> 
> You shouldn't want to know this. If anything, you should want to know 
> the POSIX minimum for this limit.
> 
> 
> >>For cases where the total list of files can be processed in pieces, 
> >>the xargs command will do the divvying up for you, invoking the 
> >>command as many times as needed to process all the arguments it reads 
> >>from standard input. Check it out--it should be in your 
> >>script-writing repertoire.
> >
> >Yup - I used xargs in my solution to this problem.  It seems not many 
> >people build linux kernels under cygwin - I think if they did, this 
> >issue I've found would have been reported earlier, because it's the 
> >first step in the kernel configuration process.
> 
> I'm guessing very few Linux kernels get built under Cygwin, but I could 
> be wrong.
> 
> That tyrant CGF, who won't let me leave, uses Linux to build Cygwin. Is 
> that irony or hypocrisy? (Right, right. It's "pragmatism.")
> 
> 
> >Thanks for your reply,
> >
> >John
> 
> 
> Randall Schulz 
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 
> 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -