Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E8B6B5D.8000501@cygwin.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 2003 08:59:41 +1000
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language:	en-au, en, en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Rainer Typke <rainer DOT typke AT cs DOT uu DOT nl>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: bug with setup.exe: saw tetex-beta even though I did not select
	prev
References:	<3E8B1752 DOT 1040207 AT cs DOT uu DOT nl>
In-Reply-To:	<3E8B1752.1040207@cs.uu.nl>

Rainer Typke wrote:
> 
> I think that setup.exe presented the tetex-beta version in the list even 
> though I did not select [prev].
> 

Thi is by design. We have a single namespace for all packages, even if 
they don't have [curr] elements. In fact prev only elements get promoted 
to curr.

But:
You should still have recieved consistent packages, what didn't get 
installed?

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -