Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:10:58 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	coreutils (formerly fileutils, sh-utils, textutils) maintainer?
Message-ID:	<20030401051058.GA2139@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4i

Does anyone want to take on the maintainership for the new coreutils
package?  This package is the accumulation of fileutils, sh-utils,
and textutils.  I've made some minor modifications to fileutils
that dimly tried to handle .exe files on cp but it never worked
right.  I'd gladly give up maintainership of this.

Otherwise, I don't believe that there are many other tweaks necessary.
Oh, wait.  There's probably a tweak necessary to make the 'test' program
use cygwin's access() rather than its builtin one.

Matthew Smith is the textutils maintainer (bcc'ed) but I don't know
if he wants the responsbility of maintaining all three packages.  If so,
he's got first dibs.

Otherwise, is anyone else interested?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -