Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/03/30/23:40:07
I went to the FAQ and found that, strangely, the upper frame containing
all the meat of the text was very small, while the lower frame
containing only about 1-1/2 inches of content was much larger. Now I
know well that you'all produce good looking pages ( NO sarcasm intended
), so I blamed my browser.
The Mozilla crew responded as follows. If they're right, the HTML
should be changed. ISTR that it would be possible to size the bottom
frame absolutely and let the upper frame occupy the rest of the
canvas. Maybe < . . . rows="*,1.5in">.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Bug 199907] Sizing of horizontally-tiled frames is wrong -
upper frame too small. (Quirks mode)
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:08:56 -0800 (PST)
From: bugzilla-daemon AT mozilla DOT org
To: superbiskit AT cox DOT net
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199907
moz AT placenamehere DOT com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |moz AT placenamehere DOT com
------- Additional Comments From moz AT placenamehere DOT com 2003-03-30 20:08 -------
Source of document shows the bottom frame is defined as 2x the theight of the top:
<frameset rows="*,2*">
<frame name="upper" src="faq_frtoc.html">
<frame name="lower" src="lower.html">
</frameset>
Which is what I'm seeing on the following OS X browsers:
Moz 1.3
Moz 3/29
Camino 3/27
Safari
IE 5.2.2
This looks INVALID to me.
reporter, can you please attach scrren shots of what you think is "right" and
"wrong"
--
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner." -- The Way of a Pilgrim; R. M. French, tr.
Life is too short to tolerate crappy software.
.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -