Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/03/30/17:56:16
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 05:52:59PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 cm1 AT mercury DOT muc DOT de wrote:
>> I couldn't find any CVS tags to build Cygwin 1.3.22 from source; the best
>> I could find was the branch "dontuse-21" which doesn't seem to be correct.
>> Is there some documentation around this somewhere on the Cygwin web pages?
>> If not, could someone let me know which tags/time stamps to use? I don't
>> want to get the 64-bit file offsets which are being worked on in the trunc
>> version by accident....
>>
>> Furthermore, is there some documentation about the tags to use for the
>> support libs such as "newlib"?
>
>This issue has been raised before. The tags are for cgf's convenience
>only. There are no guarantees that they would correspond to any
>particular version of the release. One way of figuring out the CVS
>timestamp to check out is downloading the corresponding source package and
>looking at its timestamps... I'm not sure how the timestamps will now
>interact with the development on separate branches, though. Other ways
>may be suggested by people here.
The only branches that are actively being worked on are my branch and
the trunk. There is nothing happening on any other branch.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -