Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2003 18:48:57 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Mozilla 1.3 built on cygwin?
Message-ID:	<20030328234857.GA971@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<002301c2f4b4$6e378c60$80cf06d5 AT BRAMSCHE>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<002301c2f4b4$6e378c60$80cf06d5@BRAMSCHE>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:58:50PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>I can't prove a fact, that forking is the most anonying problem and there were
>some initial work from some people (I remember  Chris Faylor, Chris January and
>other) to identify the problems and to implement a new copy-on-write semantic,
>which will be much faster,

You misremember.  I did hobble together a copy-on-write implementation and found
that it was actually slower.  The generic win32 implementation of copy-on-write
isn't powerful enough to completely implement fork anyway.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -