Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:37:14 +0100 (MET)
From:	for_spam AT gmx DOT de
To:	rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Fwd: Re: Another GPL violation: Re: Minimalistic Build-Environmentforwin32 (~7.5MB)
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated-Sender:	#0014640924 AT gmx DOT net
X-Authenticated-IP:	[193.96.115.130]
Message-ID:	<30798.1048779434@www22.gmx.net>
X-Flags:	0001

--========GMXBoundary307981048779434
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

nobody is perfect ;)
now lets be friends again and make the world a better place with OpenSource
Software - ok ?
:)

regards
Roland



--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message ---
Date: 27 Mar 2003 20:47:26 +1100
From: Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To: for_spam AT gmx DOT de
Subject: Re: Another GPL violation: Re:
Minimalistic	Build-Environmentforwin32 (~7.5MB)

> On Thu, 2003-03-27 at 20:33, for_spam AT gmx DOT de wrote:
> 
> 
> > 
> > On the rockbox mailinglist i used a VALID email address
> 
> for_spam seemed invalid at first glance - it *appears* to be a black
> hole address. 
> 
> >  - and on my win32
> > sdk page is a VALID
> > email adress, too.
> 
> I didn't see that. I stumbled across your posting about the binaries
> whilst searching for something in the cygwin mailing lists - pure
> chance.
> 
> >  It would have been no problem to have me contacted and
> > told me personally "hey - you don`t adhere to the GPL - please fix
> that".
> > 
> > Instead of that, i`ve been somewhat  "pilloried" on this mailinglist -
> an
> d
> > that`s what made me
> > angry and my answers somewhat "defiant".
> 
> It was never my intention to pillory (sic?) you. I didn't realise your
> address was valid, and when we discussed privately, it was only after
> you suggested that the GPL was not clear that I figured other folk here
> might be more clear - and ASKED you before posting back to the list.
> 
> Rob
> -- 
> GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
> 

-- 
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
--========GMXBoundary307981048779434
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA+gsiuI5+kQ8LJcoIRAssEAJ0Q5okQmWVcmsD9L6IpgjVMbvbGSQCgrtyr
t6QtnqQN918jDp0scugWKQo=
=KQ+w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--========GMXBoundary307981048779434
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
--========GMXBoundary307981048779434--

- Raw text -