Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E8272A7.50805@linuxforum.net>
Date:	Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:40:23 +0800
From:	David Huang <hzhr AT linuxforum DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language:	zh-cn, en-us, en, ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Failed non-blocking connect returns incorrect errno on AF_UNIX
	protocol
References:	<20030326124149 DOT 53b06bc5 DOT steven DOT obrien2 AT ntlworld DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20030326124149.53b06bc5.steven.obrien2@ntlworld.com>

Steven O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 08:48:33AM +0800, David Huang wrote:
> 
>>Failed non-blocking connect returns incorrect errno on AF_UNIX
>>protocol.
> 
> 
> I think it is unlikely that the app really needs the connect() call to
> be non-blocking (otherwise it would have to handle the in-progress
Well, bingo, linc(cleanup.c) use code like this.
> case). So a simple solution in most cases is to do the connect() first,
> then the fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK) so that data transfer is
> non-blocking.
Aha! Follow your hints, i modify the code, looks like linc-cleanup-sockets works
a bit correct. And I remove fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK) code, get the same result.
But, what's the different between these?
> 
> Regards,
> Steven
Thanks.
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -