Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<01bf01c2f3ea$c8854830$cf6d86d9@ellixia>
Reply-To:	"Elfyn McBratney" <elfyn-cygwin AT exposure DOT org DOT uk>
From:	"Elfyn McBratney" <elfyn-cygwin AT exposure DOT org DOT uk>
To:	"cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, "Andrew DeFaria" <ADeFaria AT Salira DOT com>
References:	<200303261832 DOT 53052 DOT jld AT ecoscentric DOT com> <NCEBJJFMCAOKNNABBFIMIEBLDFAA DOT john DOT r DOT morrison AT ntlworld DOT com> <b5stct$gjq$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3E81FE8B DOT 9060008 AT Salira DOT com> <3E82101C DOT 45E8CBE7 AT isg DOT de> <3E82139B DOT 3020109 AT Salira DOT com> <00fd01c2f3df$01f5ae90$cf6d86d9 AT ellixia> <3E8228CE DOT 20208 AT Salira DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Determining the location of a Cygwin installation
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:55:22 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300

> Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>
> >> While interesting there are two flaws here. Firstly, this down't work
> >> on all versions of Windows. Secondly, if I could get my users to set
> >> their "ApplicationPaths" I could as easily get them to set their
> >> PATHs. The real world situation is that this is not the case and
> >> neither PATH nore ApplicationPaths are set.
> >
> > So how about using something like regtool, there are quite a few
> > native (non-Cygwin dependant) regtool alikes around. From there all
> > you need to do is check HKLM or HKCU. Or write your own custom
> > implementation.
>
> What exactly am I checking for? That ApplicationPaths is set properly or
> that PATH has a Cygwin bin dir? And what if they don't. In that case I'm
> back to the same situation in trying to determine where Cygwin was
> installed.
>
> Or am I checking to see where Cygwin is installed by looking, as the
> original poster had queried, where Cygwin's bin is mounted? How does
> that fit with Christopher's assertion that that might go away? Again, I
> would think it would be far more meaningful to dedicate at least one
> registry spot to denote where Cygwin was installed and then build from
> there. Seems to be a very logical way to do it from my point of view but
> as always, this is just my opinion.

Sorry, I wasn't too clear. :-) The latter is what I meant, and if Cygwin
stops storing it's mount table in the registry setup.exe would have to know
how to access/change it so maybe (I think you suggested it) a command line
option would be best. This could show either a full or partial view of the
mount table.


Regards,

Elfyn McBratney
elfyn AT exposure DOT org DOT uk
www.exposure.org.uk



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -