Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/03/26/14:35:43
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:06:35AM -0800, Shankar Unni wrote:
> Yann Crausaz wrote:
>
> >The version of setup.exe I propose must be a bit old, isn't it ? If there's
> >a real interest, I'm OK to care about the latest version, but will poeple
> >really use RPM under Cygwin ?
>
> Good point.
>
> The real benefit to porting RPM or apt-get or whatever to Windows is as
> a possible replacement for the current installation system (if anyone
> considers RPM, and its associated GUIs, an improvement, that is).
>
> For that, however, these programs need to be *native Windows binaries*
> (i.e. no cygwin layer underneath), or you'd have a chicken-and-egg
> problem doing a first-time installation (or any time you updated cygwin
> itself).
What about linking cygwin library statically into rpm (or apt-get) binary?
--
+-------------------------------------------+
| Marcel Telka e-mail: marcel AT telka DOT sk |
| homepage: http://telka.sk/ |
| jabber: marcel AT jabber DOT sk |
+-------------------------------------------+
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -