Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<031a01c2f3cd$21eb28e0$bc57893e@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"Shankar Unni" <shankar AT cotagesoft DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<006401c2f3c8$3d082d30$0300a8c0 AT hq DOT cotagesoft DOT com>
Subject:	Re: setup.exe beta (testing needed - really!)
Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2003 19:11:54 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Shankar Unni wrote:
> Pavel Tsekov asked:
> 
>> Is it possible that the problematic box has X already installed
>> on it ? If there is an older version of a package already
>> installed, setup  will try to upgrade it.
> 
> No, it doesn't. The "current" column is blank. Also, there are no
> XFree86 packages in the download directory from before, so that's not a
> factor either, I think.
> 
> Actually, that brings up a good point: how does setup decide if a
> package has been installed, and what version of it? Where does it keep
> this information?

/etc/setup/installed.db

> Perhaps I had once installed and then removed XFree86 (I can't
> remember), and that has left some droppings behind somewhere?

More likely, it is a dependency that is pulling in XFree86.

Try diffing "cygcheck -c" outputs between your 2 boxes.

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -