delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/03/22/14:11:01

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <20030322191051.3055.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 11:10:51 -0800 (PST)
From: "Mike W." <mw487 AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: I can jam cygwin in 10 minutes in a 1000 instance loop- can you?
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.2.20030321173528.00a0b180@mail.actron.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0

Dear Neal, Corinna, Rolf, etc.

Thanks for trying the script that jams cygwin for me. 
For me the PID    _DOES_ increase monotonically,
though PPID seems to reset.  Your milage may be
better!  I agree it seems wrong, what I do not
understand is why it happens.

Corinna suggests something is wrong with my box.  Soon
I will try to jam it from an ms-dos prompt, or using
perl.  I suspect what is wrong with my box happens to
others, since my search of the archives shows similar
posts without resolution.  

Could you help me help myself more by sending the
output of

cygcheck -svh   (? on switches, from memory) as I did
in

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg01522.html

and telling me if you set "heap_chunk_in_mb", and to
what value.  I am encouraged that I may be on the
trail of the problem with your help.

Thanks. 



--- Neil wrote:
>  > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Cygnus
> Solutions\Cygwin\
>  >
>  > Create a new DWORD value there called
> "heap_chunk_in_mb" that contains the
>  > maximum amount of memory (in Mb) your application
> needs (watch the
>  > hex/decimal toggle). Exit and restart all cygwin
> applications.
>  > The default is 128 (i.e. 128Mb) if no registry
> key is set.
> 
> Although as Corinna has noted, it is possible your
> hardware may
> be flaky.  No ill effects might be noticed until you
> have situations
> that tend to stress the hardware more.  In years
> past, DOS had
> never been as stressful to hardware as running UNIX
> was.
> 
> neal
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019