Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.2.0.9.2.20030319184048.02fbba98@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2003 18:43:41 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 'cygpath -ml <posix_8.3_path>' bug?
In-Reply-To:	<20030320022747.GA2052@redhat.com>
References:	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319182259 DOT 02fbd330 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319173807 DOT 02ba6d80 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 0 DOT 20030319184305 DOT 09c2eea8 AT rogue DOT codemeta DOT com>
	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319173807 DOT 02ba6d80 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030319182259 DOT 02fbd330 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 18:27 2003-03-19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 06:25:14PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >At 17:59 2003-03-19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:42:07PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >>>Lee,
> >>>
> >>>Perhaps. In particular, if one uses Windows mode (instead of mixed
> >>>mode) you get the result I think you were expecting (except, of course,
> >>>for the orientation of the name separators).
> >>
> >>Well, since POSIX doesn't have anything like "long file names" I think
> >>you could say this isn't really a bug.  The -l is a no-op in this case.
> >>
> >>Or one could always submit a patch...
> >>
> >>cgf
> >
> >
> >Chris,
> >
> >The ostensibly failing mode is conversion _to_ a Windows format, not to
> >POSIX format.
>
>I know.  The POSIX filename /cygdrive/c/docume~1 *is* exactly what you
>see.  It doesn't have a "long equivalent".
>
>cgf


Chris

This still doesn't make sense to me. Why does "-l" give a full Windows 
name while "-m" gives a DOS name?

It seems that either "-l" is doing something it shouldn't or "-m" is 
failing to do something it should.

Randall Schulz 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -