Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3E77C405.3020004@cip.wiwi.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2003 02:12:37 +0100
From:	Huijing Zhou <hj AT cip DOT wiwi DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de>
Organization:	University of Karlsruhe
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3; MultiZilla v1.3.1.2) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Caleb Epstein <cae AT bklyn DOT org>
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, lftp AT uniyar DOT ac DOT ru
Subject:	Re: Cygwin binary of lftp 2.6.5?
References:	<3E76BA13 DOT 4020007 AT cip DOT wiwi DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de> <20030318160852 DOT GA16495 AT bklyn DOT org> <3E774B7C DOT 9030808 AT cip DOT wiwi DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de> <20030318164135 DOT GB16495 AT bklyn DOT org>
In-Reply-To:	<20030318164135.GB16495@bklyn.org>

>>>> Can someone please make a Cygwin binary of the latest lftp version?
>>>> The last one was 2.5.2, which has been quite a while now. I did try
>>>> several times to compile myself, but it never succeeded "out of the
>>>> box".  Thanks in advande.
 >>>
>>> Just built 2.6.5 out of the box on the latest Cygwin.  Feel
>>> free to grab a copy from:
>>>
>>> http://etree.org/software/lftp-2.6.5-cygwin.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Unpack in /usr/local or your repository of choice.  Enjoy.
>> 
>> That's great, thank. I'm just wondering why my compile failed. I had a 
>> complete reinstallation of Cygwin (all packages) two days ago and still 
>> lftp 2.6.5 failed to compile.
> 
> Make sure you're not building with gcc-mingw.  I think I was
> doign that and was hitting lots of weird issues with various
> Windows DLLs.  Removing the gcc-mingw package seems to fix the
> problem.  I just did ./configure && make && make install.  No
> errors.

That's strange. I sure was not adding "--mno-cygwin" anywhere. But AFAIK 
compiling under Cygwin doesn't use the "win32 native" mode anyway. It 
shouldn't be necessary to *remove* the mingw package!?

Huijing

-- 
Huijing Zhou <hj AT cip DOT wiwi DOT uni-karlsruhe DOT de>
CIP Computer Lab, Faculty of Economics
University of Karlsruhe, Germany
http://www2.wiwi.uni-karlsruhe.de


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -