delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Authentication-Warning: | eos.vss.fsi.com: ford owned process doing -bs |
Date: | Wed, 12 Mar 2003 14:53:33 -0600 (CST) |
From: | Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com> |
X-X-Sender: | ford AT eos |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: cygwin gcc 3.4 and cygwin |
Message-ID: | <Pine.GSO.4.44.0303121446300.2707-100000@eos> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Brian Ford wrote: >Cygwin's gcc has an extensive number of patches and is pre 3.2. There >must be a reason for this. Maybe it is just volunteer time, but somehow >I doubt it. Christopher Faylor wrote: >There is no hidden agenda here. > Ok. But is it "kosher" for me to submit and revise patches to vanilla gcc that I did not write, ie. those that are already part of Cygwin's gcc? >If you want to improve the trunk version of gcc, feel free to submit >patches to the appropriate mailing list. You do have an assignment on >file with the FSF, right? > So far, all of my patches to FSF software have been classified as "trivial" or were before the strict assignment campaign. This is obviously easily fixable by me when necessary, though. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International Phone: 314-551-8460 Fax: 314-551-8444 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |