Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:39:35 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cygwin gcc 3.4 and cygwin
Message-ID:	<20030312163935.GA15393@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0303121006550 DOT 2707-100000 AT eos>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0303121006550.2707-100000@eos>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:13:35AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:54:13PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>FWIW, I build cygwin itself with an unpatched version of gcc several
>>times a day.
>>
>
>Gee.  I hope Cygwin, and anything else you compile with that compiler for
>Cygwin, does not have structures containing doubles.  Without
>MASK_ALIGN_DOUBLE in TARGET_SUBTARGET_DEFAULT of gcc/config/i386/cygwin.h,
>the standard Cygwin compiler and vanilla gcc are ABI incompatible.
>
>Doesn't this seem bad?

Oh, it seems horrific.  Now I won't be able to sleep at night.  Thanks a
lot.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -