Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/03/07/11:59:56
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are
> > attached.
> >
> > # of expected passes 240
> > # of unexpected failures 1
> > # of unexpected successes 3
> > # of expected failures 18
>
> Thanks for the report.
You're welcome :)
> I removed the three unexpected successes from the list of known
> unexpected successes since they are expected ;-)
OK - I'll update my Makefile at the next release so I get the right test
suite.
BTW: is there any way to get the "current" or "latest" snapshot with a
simple wget? (i.e. is there a http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/latest...?)
It would make it easier to make a "snapshot" target and get the
new-cygwin1.dll from there :)
> The symlink problem is a bit tricky. However, it just checks for a
> non-portable condition anyway so I'm not sure it's worth to fix...
Relevant part of output is:
--- snip ---
link01 1 FAIL : symlink(object, symbolic) was succesful.
creat(object, 0700) was succesful.
link(symbolic, "nick") was successful
A lstat of symbolic (ino:2037236) and of
nick (ino:1250805), does not show them being the same ino.
link01 2 FAIL : symlink(object, symbolic) was succesful.
link(symbolic, "nick") failed, errno: 2
link of new file to object file via symbolic link file failed when
expected not to
--- snap ---
ciao!
rlc
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -