delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-ID: | <001201c2e336$d63f5890$78d96f83@pomello> |
From: | "Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net> |
To: | "Martin Wolters" <wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <157240-22003335151848272 AT M2W097 DOT mail2web DOT com> <200303051712 DOT 22830 DOT wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com> <007801c2e332$ee841a20$78d96f83 AT pomello> <200303051730 DOT 58213 DOT wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: GCC-3.2 problem: undefined ___gxx_personality_v0 |
Date: | Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:46:57 -0000 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 |
Martin Wolters wrote: > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 17:19, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Martin Wolters wrote: >>> On Wednesday 05 March 2003 16:18, lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com wrote: >>>> OK. And that file contains only C code? >>> >>> That's a good question. I thought so and I still think so. However, >>> I just tried "g++ myCFile.c" and it compiles like a charm!! >>> >>> Well, maybe I can find the code that breaks the gcc-build. And if it >>> turns out to be a valid c-construct I'll send the requested >>> informationen. But for now I at least have a "workaround". >> >> foo.C means C++. Could your file extension be uppercase accidentally? > > Now that is interesting and it actually is the cause of all troubles. > My file is really called "MYCFILE.C". Renaming it (mycfile.c) and > then using gcc mycfile.c works perfectly. > > I didn't now the upper-case C rule. Is that gcc-specific? I found this by googling on "C cpp c++ cxx cc": Compiler possible endings GNU compiler g++ C cc cpp cxx c++ Watcom C++ -- cc cpp cxx c++ Borland C++ -- cc cpp cxx c++ SGI compiler CC C cc cpp cxx c++ DEC compiler cxx C cc cpp cxx -- Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |