Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<007801c2e332$ee841a20$78d96f83@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	"Martin Wolters" <wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<157240-22003335151848272 AT M2W097 DOT mail2web DOT com> <200303051712 DOT 22830 DOT wol AT codingtechnologies DOT com>
Subject:	Re: GCC-3.2 problem: undefined ___gxx_personality_v0
Date:	Wed, 5 Mar 2003 16:19:00 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Martin Wolters wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 March 2003 16:18, lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com wrote:
>> OK.  And that file contains only C code?
> 
> That's a good question. I thought so and I still think so. However, I
> just tried "g++ myCFile.c" and it compiles like a charm!!
> 
> Well, maybe I can find the code that breaks the gcc-build. And if it
> turns out to be a valid c-construct I'll send the requested
> informationen. But for now I at least have a "workaround".

foo.C means C++. Could your file extension be uppercase accidentally?

Max.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -