Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.2.0.9.2.20030303101821.031c7830@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:22:27 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin rsync bug with windows shares
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0303031307580.25599-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu
	>
References:	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030303092549 DOT 0297ac08 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Igor,

I think I understood your meaning, and I'm not in favor of placing any 
blame on the posters in this matter. As I mentioned in my earlier reply 
to David Sheridan, I assumed from the beginning that he had no control 
over that disclaimer.

I was really curious if Chris has a way of detecting and filtering out 
the disclaimer text itself, leaving the message content intact, which 
is what his single-sentence posting seemed to suggest he was *so* 
tempted to do.

Randall Schulz

"Righteous indignation makes the world go 'round.
  And 'round and 'round, right down the drain."


At 10:13 2003-03-03, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>Umm, Randall, I think you've missed the point of my post.  I claimed that
>people should not be blamed for something they have no control over, and
>suggested a means of giving them the control.  It *must* require
>cooperation from the sender.  Should they choose to ignore this control,
>they'll deserve every ounce of abuse they get.  Please do not deprive the
>members of this list from the opportunity to be rightfully mean! ;-)
>
>Perhaps when (and if) this is implemented, it could be added to the FAQ,
>so people won't be able to (validly) complain that this is not documented
>anywhere.  Then, along with the abuse, we could point them to the FAQ. :-)
>     Igor
>
>On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>
> > Chris,
> >
> > Clearly this is now an open topic, so...
> >
> > Do you have a good way to do this? Igor's suggestion seems sound and
> > easily implementable, but short of some kind of cooperation from the
> > sender (in the form of a tag of some sort that marks the end of the
> > real content of their posting), it seems like a pretty difficult problem.
> >
> > Do you have some kind of statistical text processing software you can
> > easily invoke to do this?
> >
> > Randall Schulz
> >
> >
> > At 07:22 2003-03-03, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >I am *so* tempted to add a filter to strip this crap out of email 
> sent here.
> > >
> > >cgf
> > >
> > >On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:05:27AM -0000, Sheridan, David wrote:
> > > >PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential...


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -