Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
From:	"Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Processes are unable to fully discard their controlling terminal
Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:08:11 -0500
Message-ID:	<EKEJIKAILPONGGENMBGAEEDLCLAA.nhv@cape.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
In-Reply-To:	<20030303160957.GC21446@redhat.com>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Virus-Scanned:	Cape.Com VirusScan, no known virus found

Christopher Faylor writes:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:59:14AM -0500, Norman Vine wrote:
> >
> >However I am seeing a new twist.
 
> Corinna noticed something similar.  I wonder why something is 
> deciding that
> it needs to allocate a console.
> 
> The latest snapshot may work better although I realized as I was driving
> to work that there will be some problems there too, especially with
> CYGWIN=tty.

This seems to be working better < no extra consoles >

<503> nhv
$ echo $CYGWIN
ntsec codepage:oem

Thanks !

Norman

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -