Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:25:53 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	sebastien DOT poncet AT nc-2 DOT fr
Subject:	Re: GPL Violation
Message-ID:	<20030303152553.GD29464@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, sebastien DOT poncet AT nc-2 DOT fr
References:	<CE06EB9079A27349B9CBEFFEBE93F741022B6F AT mxltds07 DOT ncf DOT local>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CE06EB9079A27349B9CBEFFEBE93F741022B6F@mxltds07.ncf.local>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:54:15PM +0100, Poncet S?bastien wrote:
>Concerning http://spt.free.fr/fetchmail/ ...
>
>Allthought I understand what you mean, I got first very angry.  I will
>modify my page very soon and will only provide the modified sources.
>Thanks for explanations.

Yeah, think how I feel having to explain this over and over again and
having people assume that the person responsible for the project (working
for a company who bases all of their offerings on GPLed products) is such
an idiot that he doesn't understand how his product is licensed.

Yeah, I sure do love these licensing discussions.  They really make my
day.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -