Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<20030227211152.57597.qmail@web21401.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:11:52 -0800 (PST)
From:	Rick Rankin <rick_rankin AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: tetex 2.0.1-1 listed under 'previous' in setup.ini
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	janneke AT gnu DOT org
In-Reply-To:	<3.0.6.32.20030227215340.007a0a60@127.0.0.1>
MIME-Version:	1.0

I was just discussing this with Jan Nieuwenhuizen, and I believe he's going to
take care of it.

--Rick
--- Ton van Overbeek <v-overbeek AT cistron DOT nl> wrote:
> I noticed when tetex and lilypond were released yesterday, that only 
> lilypond showed up in setup.exe. Checking the downloaded setup.ini made
> clear why:
> tetex 20020911-1 is still listed as the current version,
> while tetex 2.0.1-1 is now listed as the previous version.
> Probably the automated production of setup.ini got confused by the change
> from a date based version to a 'normal' version.
> Can somebody please correct this ?
> 
> Ton van Overbeek
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -