Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<3.0.6.32.20030227215340.007a0a60@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender:	ton AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1 (Unverified)
Date:	Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:53:40 +0100
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Ton van Overbeek <v-overbeek AT cistron DOT nl>
Subject:	tetex 2.0.1-1 listed under 'previous' in setup.ini
Cc:	janneke AT gnu DOT org
Mime-Version:	1.0

I noticed when tetex and lilypond were released yesterday, that only 
lilypond showed up in setup.exe. Checking the downloaded setup.ini made
clear why:
tetex 20020911-1 is still listed as the current version,
while tetex 2.0.1-1 is now listed as the previous version.
Probably the automated production of setup.ini got confused by the change
from a date based version to a 'normal' version.
Can somebody please correct this ?

Ton van Overbeek


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -