Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.2.0.9.2.20030224225919.02dcc990@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:06:17 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: loopback devise (was Re: mknod implementation? ... )
In-Reply-To:	<3.0.5.32.20030225004921.00f3b760@mail.earthlink.net>
References:	<20030225013751 DOT GB24688 AT redhat DOT com>
	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030224134817 DOT 0299ae90 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030224130818 DOT 01dae398 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
	<OF740BE822 DOT 6DFA596C-ON88256CD7 DOT 0072DD1B AT hughes DOT com>
	<5 DOT 2 DOT 0 DOT 9 DOT 2 DOT 20030224134817 DOT 0299ae90 AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Robert,

I don't think a loopback device in Cygwin would get you anywhere. 
Cygwin doesn't implement file systems. It's notion of "mounting" is 
very different from that of Unix or even Windows. A Cygwin mount is 
just a kind of name mapping, really (with a few options attached to the 
mount such as default file access mode, in the text vs. binary sense).

Even if you had a file system image in a file (even if it was a file 
system format supported by Windows), a loopback device supported by 
Cygwin wouldn't get you anywhere. Possibly Windows itself would be 
amenable to this concept of a loopback driver, but the loopback driver 
would have to be a Windows driver. If you had a Windows loopback driver 
and a Linux file system image file, you'd still be stuck, since Windows 
includes no file system driver for non-Windows file systems (though 
there may well be 3rd-party drivers for that purpose).


Randall Schulz


At 22:49 2003-02-24, Robert Citek wrote:

>At 08:37 PM 2/24/2003 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:52:15PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >>Does Cygwin have a loopback block device?
> >
> >No.
> >
> >As Randall correctly points out, the existence of the mknod command has
> >no bearing on the existence of functionality like a loopback device.
>
>Are there plans to include the functionality of a loopback device in future
>releases of Cygwin?  If so, what can I do to help that process along?  Keep
>in mind I am not a systems programer.
>
>Regards,
>- Robert


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -