delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/02/21/10:30:42

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <8C6D4989662C304087C58904BAB721A54B73C7@Hermes.astrum.de>
From: Harald Kierer <Harald DOT Kierer AT astrum DOT de>
To: "'Pieter Prinsloo'" <pietp AT fedile DOT co DOT za>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: problem report: gawk 3.1.1
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:09:51 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pieter Prinsloo [mailto:pietp AT fedile DOT co DOT za]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:45 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: Re: problem report: gawk 3.1.1

> >> Have a query/problem with gawk version 3.1.1-5 dated 17/Oct/2002.
> > Did you read the thread "awk CR/LF issue"? It's been a topic today.
> 
> Yep - that should be obvious - but not the same problem.

Why not? You say that "the results vary", but you dont point out
*how* they vary! As far as I can see it, its the line endings...?
So why not try an older gawk as proposed in the other thread.
Its a fact that cygwins(?) gawk behaviour changed concerning CR/LF.

Actually I didnt even get your problem. Your first post is at
least confusing. What about a clear and simple test case?
Or even better, stick to a gawk list.

bye,
 harry

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019