delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-Id: | <200302201741.h1KHf2600745@delorie.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Newsgroups: | gmane.os.cygwin |
Subject: | Re: Seg fault in home-built mutt |
From: | news AT garydjones DOT mailshell DOT com |
References: | <03Feb18.233048-0800_pst.294445-7528+101 AT lmg DOT ahnet DOT net> <20030220145004 DOT GI1744 AT tishler DOT net> |
User-Agent: | Xnews/4.11.09 |
X-No-Archive: | yes |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Gate: | Hamster/1.3.23.185 NewsToMail-Gate |
Date: | Thu, 20 Feb 2003 18:43:54 +0100 |
On 20 Feb 2003, Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:01:20PM +0100, > news AT garydjones DOT mailshell DOT com wrote: >> I managed to get mutt built at the weekend such that >> the dotlock stuff was external. The build I made was >> as follows: >> Mutt 1.4i (2002-05-29) >> [snip] >> System: CYGWIN_98-4.10 1.3.20(0.73/3/2) (i686) [using >> ncurses 5.2] Compile options: >> -DOMAIN >> -DEBUG >> -HOMESPOOL -USE_SETGID -USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Shouldn't the above be +USE_DOTLOCK? I'm not sure. I said: $ ./configure --enable-external-dotlock --enable-buffy-size --enable-locales-fix (the first option per your email at http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg00816.html, as it happens :) and that's what the resulting 'make install' produced. > I have a private mutt build with the following > configuration: [snip] > Do you want me to send it to you to see if it works with > your testcase? TBH I would prefer to know what the config was that Gary R. Van Sickle used so that I can include/exclude features until I find out what feature is responsible. Otherwise I (might) get a mutt which works but whatever bug might be lying around in the code would remain. Thanks though, I appreciate the thought. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |