Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:26:49 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: An apology...
Message-ID:	<20030218172649.GA7761@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<b2tkuo$20g$1 AT main DOT gmane DOT org> <3E52594C DOT 8050406 AT rfk DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3E52594C.8050406@rfk.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:03:24AM -0500, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc.) wrote:
>This has all been hashed out in the email archives more than once.

Yes, it was hashed out in the thread that this one references!
Apparently there is a serious lack of technical ability on the part of
the person who sent the message.

Seeing the number of messages that have already replied, I suppose that
it's to late to suggest this now, but I would really suggest that we
just ignore this post.  The question has already been asked and
answered.  It should say something that the asker can't even figure out
how to read the answers.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -