delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Brian Kelly" <brian DOT m DOT kelly AT verizon DOT net> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: kudos! |
Date: | Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:55:22 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <000f01c2d6ad$bec84f40$6700a8c0@maxstars8g31h2> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 |
In-Reply-To: | <5.2.0.9.2.20030215180606.0277da60@pop3.cris.com> |
Importance: | Normal |
X-Authentication-Info: | Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop015.verizon.net from [141.153.192.209] at Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:52:27 -0600 |
Does this mean that Cygwin is not ready for production?? Darn!! and I was just getting ready to roll it out to my biggest client - Randy's Pizza and Bait. ( sorry - not realation ) Brian Kelly -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Randall R Schulz Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 9:22 PM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: kudos! Alec, There appears to have been an error in the delivery your message. All that got through was a simple thank-you and a compliment. Apparently lost in the transmission of your message was the part following the complimentary thank-you in which you complain about the idiotic way in which file permissions are handled, the blatant failure of the "login" and "su" commands, the non-standard tty signal handling and dozens of other not-too-small defects that collectively show that the Cygwin engineers (so-called) know nothing about security, Unix, Windows, C/C++ or probably even what a Turing machine is. Also missing was the incontrovertible and unambiguous evidence of Cygwin's utter shoddiness displayed by your perfectly functional Linux software whose compilation under Cygwin causes the seriously mis-configured GCC compiler to emit thousands of diagnostics and how after you managed to squelch them all, the resulting executable not only crashes immediately after being invoked but also causes Cygwin to bring your system down with a BSOD. Could you resend please? We prefer HTML mail with lots of embedded screen shots in BMP format that depict the multifarious defects in graphic detail for all the world to see. Thanks. We'll all feel better when we get that. Randall Schulz At 18:05 2003-02-15, Alec Effrat wrote: >Just wanted to drop a note... kudos on a great thing for those of us >enslaved on a wintendo. > > > > >-- -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |