Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:38:17 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Is gcc 2 still supported in cygwin at all?
Message-ID:	<20030217153817.GA3564@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030217093604 DOT 32370 DOT qmail AT web10010 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20030217093604.32370.qmail@web10010.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:36:04AM -0800, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>I'm just wondering, because I got 0 replies for my
>bugreport on this mailing list last week.

It's supported, but, like everything, unless you can demonstrate with
a *simple* test case that there is actually a gcc problem (which is
unlikely) rather than a programming error (which is more likely), you
aren't apt to get much help.

And, FYI, "it works on linux" is not a guaranteed indication that there
is a problem with cygwin's gcc.

cgf
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -