Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: [Problem] mempcpy is missing? (FAQ alert)
Date:	Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:50:02 -0500
Lines:	12
Message-ID:	<3E4EEE4A.5020302@ece.gatech.edu>
References:	<20030215210505 DOT GA29578 AT redhat DOT com> <010601c2d537$decb05c0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <20030215215840 DOT GA3446 AT redhat DOT com> <3E4EC408 DOT 8070500 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <004201c2d546$ba7482a0$78d96f83 AT pomello> <3E4ECC52 DOT 50609 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20030215234909 DOT GB12171 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT main DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language:	en-us, en

Christopher Faylor wrote:
>  Breaking up the headers or
> adding a OS-specific "capability.h", or something similar, which defines
> __HAVE_CLOCK would probably be the best way to deal with this.  Assuming
> that this was a major issue -- which I don't think it is.

You mean, if it ain't broke don't mess with it?

Where have I heard that before...

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -