Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<002001c2d544$c9f64e90$78d96f83@pomello>
From:	"Max Bowsher" <maxb AT ukf DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0302151434380 DOT 15904-100000 AT www DOT eyesopen DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [Problem] mempcpy is missing? (FAQ alert)
Date:	Sat, 15 Feb 2003 22:51:33 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Roger Sayle wrote:
> Might I suggest that if keeping cygwin and newlib in sync is
> logistically very complicated, and you don't wish to provide
> cygwin-specific headers, you might ask the newlib folks
> to incorporate "#ifndef __CYGWIN__" tags in their upstream
> headers.
> 
> This approach makes it far easier for other newlib distributions
> to strip these lines, than it it would be for cygwin's build
> machinery (as suggested by Max)

Umm... no. I didn't say that.

Max.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -