Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:59:49 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install?
Message-ID:	<20030215195949.GB28395@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030215082300 DOT GF5822 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKCENEDMAA DOT g DOT r DOT vansickle AT worldnet DOT att DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<NCBBIHCHBLCMLBLOBONKCENEDMAA.g.r.vansickle@worldnet.att.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:57:23PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>>Isn't it, in the first place the "Cygwin Package Manager"?  "cpm"?
>>Even the suffix of the archive files could be cpm...
>
>It's not at all unprecedented for Windows "installers" to be "dual-use"
>like Cygwin Setup is.  The control panel API even directly supports
>such use (eg.  change/remove buttons).  Change the name to "Cygwin
>Package Manager", and people will think you need cygwin already
>installed to use it.  Let's keep the "Setup" moniker, strive to keep
>that end as Windowesqe as makes sense, and let the unavoidable chips
>fall where they may.

Hear, here.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -