Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:32:29 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install?
Message-ID:	<20030214193229.GA23190@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20030214182615 DOT GA20996 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 44 DOT 0302141331580 DOT 7773-100000 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.44.0302141331580.7773-100000@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.1i

On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:34:59PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> I tried an experiment recently where I turned on ftp access to the
>> cygwin download directory on sources.redhat.com.  The result seemed
>> to be that people started downloading cygwin's package .tar.bz2 files
>> directly and (somehow) used tar to extract files rather than running
>> setup.exe.
>>
>> So, that experiment was a bad idea.  I turned off access again.  Yet, I
>> still have the feeling that many people are downloading packages
>> directly (from mirrors I suppose) and then we get to experience the
>> maddening "I downloaded foo and it gives me an error about missing bar.
>> What in the world could possibly be the problem????"
>>
>> Can anyone offer any explanation about this?  Or maybe convince me that
>> I'm wrong in noticing this trend?  I suppose that it is possible that
>> we are now hitting a newer stupider brand of user who just can't be
>> bothered to read the cygwin web site and click on a link to download
>> but I'm wondering if there is another explanation.  Maybe there is
>> a popular web page out there with wrong advice or something...
>>
>> cgf
>
>Well, guess what comes up first on a Google search for "cygwin install"?
>See for yourself: <http://google.com/search?q=cygwin+install> (just in
>case, the first match I get is <http://www.woodsoup.org/projs/ORKiD/basic.htm>,
>last updated on March 24, 2000). :-(

This is interesting but it doesn't really explain the problem since the site
is so outdated.  sourceware.cygnus.com doesn't even exist anymore.

>I don't know if there's anything that can be done about it, though...

How about if every able-bodied cygwin-mailing-list person sends email to this
person and asks them to take the site down.

FWIW, I've recently sent email to Mumit Khan for similar reasons.  His
"ancient" gnu-win32 site still shows up in google and some of the
outdated techniques espoused there demonstrably cause confusion.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -