Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<200302140717510271.170EF3BD@smtp.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To:	<4.3.2.7.2.20030212120648.00b465f8@mail.alphatech.com>
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20030211223714 DOT 00b34488 AT mail DOT alphatech DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20030211211924 DOT 00b31238 AT mail DOT alphatech DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20030211211924 DOT 00b31238 AT mail DOT alphatech DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20030211223714 DOT 00b34488 AT mail DOT alphatech DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20030212120648 DOT 00b465f8 AT mail DOT alphatech DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2003 07:17:51 +0100
From:	"Bart Lamot" <blamot AT xs4all DOT nl>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Interest in gcc 3.2.2?
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id h1E62wu30181

Alan,

Ok now its clear to me, thnx! :)
Well the stuff ur doin is rather intresting but i think they won't help me for now.
What i am trying to do is to compile my java program to a native executable, that works but not if I use threads....
At runtime i get the warning that threads ain't available, althoug the pthread lib is there and gcc is build with the threads on option

Maybe if I re-compile gcc myself...didn't try that

Grtz,
Bart

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 12-2-2003 at 12:16 Alan Thompson wrote:

>Bart - I am using JNI, so I compile the C++ stuff with g++ 3.2.2 and I
>compile the java stuff with J2SDK 1.4.1.  Then, they can magically talk to
>each other so I can hook up my legacy code to java, RMI, Jini, JDBC, etc. 
>The Java stuff runs in Sun's JRE 1.4.1 and calls the C++ code through the
>JNI.  I also have callbacks from the C++ code into Java objects running in
>the JVM.
>
>So, in response to the question "Are you or aren't you compiling your java
>program to a native executable??", the answer is a resounding "Yes".
>
>Alan Thompson
>
>P.S. My apologies if the JNI part didn't quite leap out in my first
>message....it was a followup to a previous thread about <iostream> and JNI
>with g++ 3.2.
>
>P.P.S.  I hadn't thought about compiling Java to a native executable. 
>I'll have to think about that for future projects, perhaps.
>
>
>At 07:19 PM 2/12/2003 +0100, Bart Lamot wrote:
>>Allen,
>>
>>Are you or aren't you compiling your java program to a native executable??
>>Because if you are the I don't get the Sun 1.4.1 remark...
>>If you aren't (and thus are using gcj just to compile to class files and
>use a JRE to run) i don't get why u are doing this if u stick with Sun.....
>>
>>I am lost....but am i clear?
>>
>>Grtz,
>>Bart
>
>
>
>--
>Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
>Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
>FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -